3 Comments
User's avatar
Quambale Bingle's avatar

How would you respond if someone found this argument persuasive from a left-wing point of view, such that it either convinced them to become a eugenicist feminist against undesirable men, or a pro-patriarchy communist in the name of opposing the eugenical effect of female attraction?

Expand full comment
Erik Engheim's avatar

Then they would not be leftist because that is an argument from nature. The left generally speaking tends to emphasize nurture. That if people are not behaving as we wish they did we must improve living conditions, education, welfare policies etc.

It is more of a choice by the right to pursue exclusion and eradication of people deemed undesirable in a biological sense whether that is race, gender or sexual orientation.

Anyway I may very well have misunderstood your question so if my answer seems off please elaborate on your idea so I can respond better 😉

Expand full comment
David Regehr 🇨🇦's avatar

In the animal kingdom females have always chosen their mates and they should always maintain that power. After all, their biology is key to procreatio and they do 98% of the work to bring those newborns to adulthood.

To the men who don't understand nature, clean up your act such that you are attractive to the women. Show them the respect they deserve and that you are worthy of their attention. Women are never going to be property ever again. Any other point of view is self pitying garbage.

Expand full comment